Showing posts with label CPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPS. Show all posts
, , , , , ,

Join CTU at Feb 4th Rally Against Mass Layoffs

February 2, 2016 0 comments

It's time to show our strength. 

Graphic by Ellen Gradman @sparkyourart


VIA CTU Facebook Event Page:

CPS has done it. As expected, they have announced layoffs of 1,000 or more educators in a letter sent today to the CTU. They also said that they would take 7% of our pay through the pension pickup within 30 days and redirect anti-poverty funds to general expenses.

The union spent fifteen months trying to get a serious offer out of the Board. After only three weeks of negotiations, CPS made an offer that (1) relied on a reduction of more than 2,000 educators from the system, (2) made no provision against ballooning class sizes as a result, and (3) included nothing but the vaguest indicators of where new revenue will be pursued. 

The mayor has had every opportunity to pursue revenue from his wealthy friends and backers. Instead he has targeted educators and students to pay for the Board’s mismanagement. CPS has shot down the flag of truce and peace talks are over. It is time for Chicago’s educators and public school supporters to take off the gloves and head out to the streets. 

We will start the march at Bank of America at 135 South Lasalle and finishing at City Hall. Please note: THIS WILL BE A NONVIOLENT AND SAFE RALLY! Attending the rally will not put you at risk of arrest or sanction.

RSVP to CTU at https://www.facebook.com/events/1674831469456432/ 

TSJer Phil Cantor explains a teachers view of the CPS/CTU contract fight: http://phillipcantor.com/2016/02/03/why-ctu-still-doesnt-have-a-contract/ Read the Full Story

, , , , , ,

A response to “Teaching About Laquan McDonald: A Toolkit for Teachers”

December 4, 2015 0 comments


A response to “Teaching About Laquan McDonald: A Toolkit for Teachers”

December 3, 2015
By:  Danny B Martin, PhD, professor of curriculum and instruction and mathematics
       Josh Radinsky, PhD, associate professor of curriculum and instruction
       Cecily Relucio Hensler, PhD Curriculum Studies student
       David O. Stovall, PhD, professor of educational policy studies
Download this analyis as a PDF | Short URL for online version:  education.uic.edu/toolkit
In anticipation of the release of video of the killing of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald by a Chicago police officer, Chicago Public Schools (CPS) created a document titled “Teaching About Laquan McDonald: A Toolkit for Teachers” that was made available to teachers over the Thanksgiving holiday. The toolkit is “designed to help guide a difficult conversation, if you choose to discuss the case in class.” It aims “to ensure teachers feel comfortable and prepared,” anticipating that many CPS students will have seen the video of the shooting and media coverage of the ensuing protests.
As teachers and teacher educators at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) College of Education, we support CPS’s aim of helping teachers and students productively discuss LaQuan McDonald’s killing and its aftermath. This is a critical and tragic moment that demands our attention, and teachers need to be supported in their efforts to create educational spaces for young people to make sense of these events.
However, the CPS toolkit raises many questions and concerns for us. There is no mention of the reasons why this case has sparked massive protests, nor that it is one of numerous police killings and assaults on African American citizens that have been documented and protested within the last year alone. While the details of this case are unique, the events surrounding it are not isolated. A culmination of similar historical moments nationwide (many not captured on videotape) has led up to this moment in Chicago.
As public educators, we wish to offer some suggestions of how to better serve youth, communities and educators in Chicago. We are all struggling to understand these events, and how they reflect larger historical, social and political forces and conditions. We hope to reframe the discussion on the important teaching and learning that needs to happen at this time.

CPS’ Summary of the Case

The Introduction to the lesson plan describes the killing of Laquan McDonald on October 20, 2014, and offers an account of the events that followed. This account mirrors the account given by City and police department officials: it uses the word immediately (twice) and the phrase several days later to suggest a timely investigation, and emphasizes that the officer was charged with first degree murder, as if to imply an aggressive prosecution of the case. Not mentioned are the reports that officers at the scene dispersed witnesses, failing to take statements from those who might have provided a different account. There is no mention of the fact that the video contradicts CPD testimony, that the charges were not brought until a judge ordered the video’s release (against CPD’s wishes), or of widespread demands for the resignation of the States Attorney, CPD Chief, and Mayor.
The introduction to the lesson plan also makes excuses for delays by the City and State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez throughout the investigation. These delays have been widely criticized by local and national press, and especially by local community members. The introduction fails to point out that the $5 million settlement with the family was not the result of a lawsuit, but was initiated by the City in apparent acknowledgment of the egregiousness of the case. Also omitted is the fact that the murder occurred four months before the mayoral primary election of 2014, and the $5 million settlement was finalized one week after the runoff election. It is not accurate to state that the only reason the video was not released earlier was “so as not to interfere with an active criminal investigation,” and both national and local press have challenged this assertion.
We are troubled that CPS would repeat this much-questioned narrative from City officials in a lesson plan for teachers and students, as if it were the district’s own narrative of the events of the case. No news outlets have offered an account of events that so cleanly adheres to the official story. Mayoral control of the district should not mean that CPS curriculum is used to parrot City officials’ talking points. A lesson plan designed to meet the learning needs of young people should not be used as a vehicle for political manipulation.

The Learning Goals of the Lesson

CPS frames the lesson around six learning goals:
  1. “Give students a safe outlet for expressing their thoughts without arguing about the incident.”
The killing of LaQuan McDonald, and the circumstances and events preceding and following it, are complicated and troubling. It takes time, energy, and political will to create space for young people to grapple with these issues in all of their complexity. We believe that differences of opinion, as well as intense emotional and physical responses -- anger, grief, distress, confusion, fatigue -- are appropriate and necessary when confronted with the violent and unjust loss of human life, especially that of an adolescent of color. Rather than suggest that teachers suppress students’ reactions (“without arguing”), we recommend curriculum activities like those developed by Project NIA (see links below) that encourage students to experience and process these reactions.
  1. “Have students imagine the best possible outcome.”
The best possible outcome of what, and for whom? This focus simply on students “imagining” outcomes does not suggest much faith in the ability and agency of young people, and misses the fact that many students are already actively engaged in demanding and working towards real social change. Students can learn, in this moment, what it means to take collective action to hold public institutions and officials accountable, and to redress past and present injustices. This is most urgent for students who are most negatively impacted by institutional racism and poverty. As teachers, we should help our students move beyond “imagining” outcomes, to develop their agency to make change.
  1. “Avoid further perpetuation of the fear and hatred of law enforcement that these incidents encourage.”
This does not point to any positive learning goal, and seems to ask teachers to “teach” students not to be afraid or angry. We assume that “these incidents” mean police killings and brutality against people of color. It is hard to imagine a lesson that instructs children not to be afraid, after they have watched the nightmarish image of a teenager gunned down by a police officer as he walks down the street. Teachers need ideas for how to help children of all ages process these feelings, and to understand the causes of these terrifying and enraging experiences, rather than try not to feel. There is an urgent need to establish honest and trusting relations between the police departments and communities of color nationwide, aggravated by institutional racism and patterns of police violence.
People are demanding transparency and accountability to the public. These are essential in a democratic society, and this is a perfect moment to teach these concepts clearly, and help students understand their right to demand them. Following curriculum materials like those linked below, an examination of the history of policing and the causes of police violence can allow for a deeper understanding of the reasons underlying distrust between communities of color and the police.
  1. “Help students to consider the tools for civil protest that are in the tradition of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and in the spirit of brotherhood.”
The teachings of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., are powerful, revolutionary, and highly relevant today. However, we find it puzzling that CPS looks backward a half century for a model of protest in response to oppressive forces and conditions, when powerful models of peaceful protest for social change are being organized, led by young people of color all over the country, and especially here in Chicago. An examination of the historical traditions of social movements, resistance, and struggles for liberation is a valuable goal for young people’s learning. But when they are looking out the window and seeing protest actions happening today, it seems also important to teach and learn about those movements for change that they now have the opportunity to participate in. By having a fuller understanding of historical and present day resistance, youth will be able to critically analyze representations that characterize protest as violent, criminal, and unjustified.
  1. “Help students to examine the role that race, class, privilege, and stereotyping plays not just in this incident, but in our society.”
These are important concepts to teach in the current moment, but this language still skirts some of the most important issues. “Race” is the use of categories to name members of a certain demographic group, but the more relevant issue that must be addressed in this moment is “racism.” Beyond the idea of racism as a problem of certain individuals, this is an opportunity to learn aboutsystemic racism: the views, values, and processes engaged by institutions that subordinate, marginalize and discriminate against members of particular racial groups. The concept of “stereotyping,” while an important and harmful issue, is not enough to help students understand the frightening and pervasive pattern of police killings of young people of color. The concept of systemic racism can give students a way to understand racism in its historical context, and to interrogate the relationship racism has to their lives.
  1. “Bring historical context to the conversation.”
We agree with the need to provide historical context, but none is provided in the lesson plan -- instead it is stripped of any reference to history. The current moment of social and political protest must be connected to the history of Chicago, including the relationship many communities of color have had to law enforcement throughout the city’s history.  Whereas the Introduction of the lesson presents the killing of Laquan McDonald as an isolated and “difficult” case of possible police misconduct, the event -- and the protests -- cannot be understood without learning about the legacy of systemic racism and violence that African American people have been subjected to throughout our history. To change these historical patterns, we must confront this history squarely, and understand today’s events in light of that history.
A number of educators and organizers have developed powerful materials for teaching and learning along the lines described here. We recommend that CPS teachers join these conversations and seek out support for teaching lessons that can truly help all of us to understand the events playing out in our city.

Resources for Teachers

In addition to the resources provided in the CPS lesson plan, we suggest the following:
  1. Talking About Policing and Violence with Youth: An Activity & Resource Guide, edited by Miriame Kaba, Project NIA - many lesson plans, readings and resources for teaching
  2. #Ferguson Syllabus: Talking and Teaching about Police Violence - many lesson ideas, links to readings and resources
  3. Black and Blue: History and Current Manifestations of Policing, Violence & Resistance
  4. Blue and Black: Stories of Policing and Violence, a zine by Rachel Marie-Crane Williams that can be used in lessons (here is the PDF of the zine)
  5. Project NIA - links to many teaching resources and ways to get involved
  6. Black Youth Project 100 - a Black youth organization dedicated to organizing, advocacy and education
  7. #FergusonSyllabus (via Twitter): a working collection of curriculum ideas compiled by teachers since the killing of Michael Brown, to which you can add your own lesson plans. Also see thisarchive, which is also linked from the CPS lesson plan
  8. #ChicagoSyllabus (via Twitter): a new collection of lesson ideas focused on current events in Chicago - editable google doc
  9. The Invisible Institute - a citizens’ police data project
Read the Full Story

, , , ,

CPS-Sponsored "Community Forum" on the future of Dyett HS

June 10, 2015 0 comments


Wednesday, June 17
6:00 - 8:00 PM
King College Prep HS
4445 S. Drexel
Chicago
(Candlelight Vigil to follow immediately after!)

 
Support Bronzeville's Struggle for Dyett HS!

As many of you know, TSJ is part of the struggle to revitalize Walter Dyett HS, which the Board of Education voted (in 2012) to close by this month (see attached Dyett chronology for more). However, due to sustained community pressure, CPS agreed not to close it and to accept proposals. The Coalition to Revitalize Dyett HS, of which TSJ is a member, submitted one this April (see summary here), as did two other groups. June 17, CPS is holding a "community forum" as part of the proposal process. Below is the info from the Coalition, including its call for a candelight vigil immediate following the hearing.

 TSJers, wear your TSJ t-shirt (if you have one!), we want all to see and understand that the support for the Coalition's proposal is from both within and without the community.

Further Background
The effort to reclaim Dyett HS is part of the larger education justice work in Chicago, including the campaign organized by the Grassroots Education Movement (GEM) for an Elected Representative School Board, and for 50 Sustainable Community Schools (click formore info). We are also supporting the CTU's contract demands for "a just Chicago," and were with CTU yesterday, rocking Chicago's downtown, Tuesday June 9!

Dyett HS will be one of those 50 sustainable community schools, but it's not won yet. Bronzeville residents worked for over four years to develop a "village" of schools, controlled by the community, but the Mayor, CPS, and allies refused to accept that plan and instead instigated the proposal process. Also, if the Obama Library comes to Washington Park (accelerating Bronzeville gentrification), it will be next door to the HS.

At the June 17 CPS-scheduled "community forum," the Coalition and the two other groups will present their plans followed by community testimony. Whether you live in Bronzeville or outside, you can come to the forum, support the community's long-developed plan, and speak out FOR public education and AGAINST education privatization.

The Coalition is holding a candlelight vigil immediately after the forum, demanding 50 sustainable community schools, of which Dyett will be the first.
Read the Full Story

, , , , , , , , , , , ,
April 1, 2014 0 comments

Closings by Another Name

On Friday, March 21, The Chicago Board of Education announced that it would fire every single adult in three of Chicago’s schools and hand over management of the schools to the Academy for Urban School Leadership—a politically connected private management organization with close ties to Board President David Vitale. Calling this practice “Turnaround,” the Board claims it will help students. But studies show otherwise. This is an attack on Black schools that continues the assault carried out by CPS CEO Barbara Byrd-Bennett last year, when she closed fifty schools (claiming they were the last closings for at least five years).
Calling the turnarounds, “a slap in the face to those of us who are attempting to negotiate for more resources, collaboration and support throughout our district,” CTU President Karen Lewis called for us to step up and defend our schools. “This is nothing more than school closings by another name,” said President Lewis. “After closing 50 schools, now we find three campuses more on the chopping block while the mayor continues his televised propaganda campaign of promoting these disastrous policies.”
Stand with these schools by signing up to bear witness at one of the hearings mandated by law for each affected school. Our schools need every voice to ring out for them.
Read the Full Story

, , , , , ,

TSJ Letter of Support for Teachers at Saucedo and Drummond who are Boycotting the ISAT

March 3, 2014 0 comments

(Saucedo rally - photo by Greg Goodman)

February 28, 2014

To the teachers at Saucedo Elementary and Drummond Elementary schools,

Teachers for Social Justice fully supports your decision to refuse to administer the 2014 ISAT test to your students. Thank you for taking this important step to protect your students from a week of testing that does not benefit them and does not allow teachers to teach. Your decision is a courageous one in the face of threats from the CEO of CPS that your jobs and your teaching certification may be at risk. By refusing to administer yet another standardized test you are saying “no” to the idea that a test written by a company far from the classroom can assess your students in a meaningful way.

Teachers are in a unique position to understand the damage that overuse and misuse of standardized testing can do to students. Research has shown that high stakes standardized tests narrow the curriculum; increase stress levels for teachers, parents and students, and drive many teachers from the profession. These tests make school less engaging and less relevant to students’ lives.

CPS has announced that this year the ISAT test has no impact on students’ grade promotion or admission into selective programs. The ISAT is no longer part of the “school performance policy” nor will it be used to evaluate teachers. CPS’s claim that the ISAT is aligned to Common Core standards is dubious at best since the PARCC exam, which is being designed to measure performance on those standards, has been years in the making and has yet to be released. The ISAT will not help teachers understand their students or improve instruction for them. Because CPS has not provided any valid reason to give this test hundreds of parents have opted their children out of this test. We applaud your decision to support your students and the teaching profession in this way.

Thank you for taking a stand against the misuse and overuse of standardized tests. Thank you for risking your jobs to give your students the education they deserve.

In Solidarity,

Teachers for Social Justice
Read the Full Story

, , , , , , , , ,

SUPPORT GROWS! 200 University faculties support parents & teachers at Saucedo & Drummonds schools!

(Parents and teachers at Saucedo rally - photo by Greg Goodman)

February 28, 2014

STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR CHICAGO TEACHERS REFUSING TO ADMINISTER THE ILLINOIS STANDARD ACHIEVEMENT TEST  

FROM UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FACULTY

As university faculty whose responsibilities include preparing future educators, we support the action of teachers at the Saucedo and Drummond elementary schools in Chicago who are refusing to administer the Illinois Standard Achievement Test (ISAT). Over a decade of research shows that an over emphasis on high-stakes standardized tests narrows curriculum, creates social and emotional stress for students and families, drives committed teachers out of the profession, and turns schools into test-prep factories with principals forced to comply as overseers—especially in low-scoring schools. We understand assessment as the process of gathering evidence about learning, from multiple sources, so that teachers can better support student learning. The ISAT, in contrast, contributes virtually nothing. CPS no longer uses the ISAT for promotion, graduation, or eligibility for selective-enrollment schools and is phasing it out after this year. It is not aligned with Common Core State Standards—which, regardless of how one sees them, Illinois has already adopted—and does not help teachers improve student learning. The pre-service teachers with whom we work are demoralized about a future of teaching in such a test-driven atmosphere. We teach our students—future educators—to stand up for their students, families and communities, and to take principled stands for social justice. That's what the Saucedo and Drummond teachers are doing. We applaud them and stand with them.
(To add your name to this list, email Gutstein@uic.edu with your name, university affiliation, and department)

Signers:
1.                              Pauline Lipman, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
2.                              Rico Gutstein, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
3.                              Asif Wilson, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
4.                              Daniel Morales-Doyle, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
5.                              Eleni Katsarou, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
6.                              Arthi Rao, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
7.                              Joshua Radinsky, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
8.                              Irma Olmedo, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
9.                              David Schaafsma, University of Illinois at Chicago, English Department
10.                          Kenneth Saltman, DePaul University, College of Education
11.                          Joel Amidon, University of Mississippi, School of Education
12.                          Nicole Marroquin, School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Department of Art Education
13.                          Wayne Au University of Washington—Bothel, Education Program; Rethinking Schools
14.                          Bill Schubert, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
15.                          Federico Waitoller, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
16.                          David Stovall, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
17.                          Danny Martin, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
18.                          Ann Aviles de Bradley, Northeastern Illinois University, Department of Educational Inquiry and Curriculum Studies
19.                          Eomailani Kukahiko, University of Hawai’i, College of Education
20.                          David Stinson, Georgia State University, College of Education
21.                          Minerva S. Chávez, California State University, Fullerton, Department of Secondary Education
22.                          Katy Smith, Northeastern Illinois University, Educational Inquiry and Curriculum Studies
23.                          Gail Tang, University of La Verne, Department of Mathematics
24.                          Craig Howley, Ohio University, Patton College of Education
25.                          Rodrigo Jorge Gutiérrez, University of Maryland, College of Education
26.                          Erin Turner, University of Arizona, Department of Teaching, Learning and Sociocultural Studies
27.                          Tom Pedroni, Wayne State University, College of Education
28.                          Donna Vukelich Selva, Edgewood College, School of Education
29.                          Michelle Fine, City University of New York, The Graduate Center
30.                          Maria McKenna, University of Notre Dame, Department of Africana Studies
31.                          E. Wayne Ross, University of British Columbia, Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy
32.                          Noah De Lissovoy, The University of Texas at Austin, Dept. of Curriculum and Instruction
33.                          Eugenia Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, University of South Florida, Department of Secondary Education
34.                          Bree Picower, Montclair State University, College of Education and Human Development
35.                          Beatriz S. D'Ambrosio, Miami University, Dept. of Mathematics
36.                          Celia Oyler, Teachers College, Dept. of Curriculum and Teaching
37.                          Jesse Senechal, Virginia Commonwealth University, Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium
38.                          Ira Shor, City University of New York, The Graduate Center
39.                          Thomas G. Edwards, Wayne State University, College of Education
40.                          Christine Sleeter, California State University—Monterey
41.                          Jessica Shiller, Towson University, Dept. of Instructional Leadership and Professional Development
42.                          Deb Palmer, University of Texas at Austin, Department of Curriculum and Instruction
43.                          Maren Aukerman, Stanford University, Graduate School of Education
44.                          Christine Yeh, University of San Francisco, School of Education
45.                          A. Lin Goodwin, Teachers College, Columbia University
46.                          Stuart Chen-Hayes, Lehman College, School of Education
47.                          Lee Bell, Barnard College, Program in Education
48.                          Diane Horwitz, DePaul University, College of Education
49.                          Gary Anderson, New York University, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development
50.                          Patrick Camangian, University of San Francisco, School of Education
51.                          Antonia Darder, Loyola Marymount University, School of Education
52.                          Lesley Bartlett, Columbia University, Teachers College
53.                          Sandy Grande, Connecticut College, Education Department
54.                          Michelle Gautreaux, University of British Columbia, Dept. of Curriculum Studies
55.                          Kathryn Herr, Montclair State University
56.                          Emily Klein, Montclair State University
57.                          Craig Willey, IUPUI, Indiana University School of Education
58.                          Swapna Mukhopadhyay, Portland State University, Graduate School of Education
59.                          Kiersten Greene, State University of New York at New Paltz, School of Education
60.                          Stuart Greene, University of Notre Dame, Department of English and Africana Studies
61.                          Horace R. Hall, DePaul University, College of Education
62.                          Lois Weiner, New Jersey City University, Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education
63.                          Gustavo E. Fischman, Arizona State University, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College
64.                          Amy Feiker Hollenbeck, DePaul University, College of Education
65.                          Rebecca A. Goldstein, Montclair State University, College of Education and Human Services
66.                          Enora Brown, DePaul University, College of Education
67.                          Sangeeta Kamat, University of Massachusetts—Amherst, College of Education
68.                          Stephanie Farmer, Roosevelt University, Dept. of Sociology
69.                          Ron Glass, University of California, Santa Cruz, Center for Collaborative Research for an Equitable California
70.                          Karen Monkman, DePaul University, College of Education
71.                          Lisa Edstrom, Barnard College, Barnard Education Program
72.                          Daniel S. Friedrich, Columbia University, Teachers College
73.                          Marjorie Siegel, Columbia University, Teachers College
74.                          Alan Singer, Hofstra University, Department of Teaching, Literacy and Leadership
75.                          Barbara Winslow, Brooklyn College, Secondary Education
76.                          Maria Hantzopoulos, Vassar College, Dept. of Education
77.                          Sharon Whitton, Hofstra University, Department of Teaching, Literacy and Leadership
78.                          Jim Brown, Wayne State University, College of Education
79.                          Linda McSpadden McNeil, Rice University, Center for Education
80.                          Matthew Weinstein, University of Washington-Tacoma, Secondary Science Program
81.                          Victoria Trinder, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
82.                          Marie Ann Donovan, DePaul University, College of Education
83.                          Rosalyn Baxandall, City University of New York, Labor School
84.                          Amira Proweller, DePaul University, College of Education
85.                          Judith S. Kaufman, Hofstra University, Department of Teaching, Literacy and Leadership
86.                          Gregory Smith, Lewis & Clark College, Graduate School of Education
87.                          David Forbes, Brooklyn College, School of Education
88.                          Lois Weis, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Graduate School of Education
89.                          Monica Taylor, Montclair State University, College of Education and Human Services
90.                          Norma Lopez-Reyna, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
91.                          Gloria Alter, DePaul University, College of Education
92.                          Miguel Zavala, California State University, Fullerton, Department of Secondary Education
93.                          Barbara Madeloni, University of Massachusetts Amherst, School of Education
94.                          Arnold Dodge, Long Island University/C.W.Post Campus, Department of Educational Leadership and Administration
95.                          William Ayers, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education (retired)
96.                          Peter Taubman, Brooklyn College, Dept. of Secondary Education
97.                          Susan Gregson, University of Cincinnati, College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services
98.                          Jackie Wiggins, Oakland University, Department of Music, Theatre, and Dance
99.                          Tema Okun, National Louis University, Dept. of Educational Leadership
100.                      Bill Hoecker, DePaul University, College of Education
101.                      Judith Gouwens, Roosevelt University, College of Education
102.                      Carl B. Anderson, Penn State University, Dept. of English
103.                      Mari Ann Roberts, Clayton State University, Dept. of Teacher Education
104.                      Isabel Nuñez, Concordia University, Center for Policy Studies and Social Justice
105.                      Renee A. Middleton, Ohio University, The Patton College of Education
106.                      Regina Sievert, Salish Kootenai College, Division of Education
107.                      Jennifer Alexander, Richard J. Daley College, Business Department
108.                      Sunshine Campbell, The Evergreen State College
109.                      Marvin Hoffman, University of Chicago, Urban Teacher Education Program
110.                      Chris Brown, University of Texas at Austin, College of Education
111.                      Nancy Lesko, Teachers College, Department of Curriculum and Teaching
112.                      Florence R. Sullivan, University of Mass., Amherst, College of Education
113.                      K. Wayne Yang, University of California, San Diego, Dept. of Ethnic Studies
114.                      Elizabeth Meadows, Roosevelt University, College of Education
115.                      Benay Blend, Central New Mexico Community College, Humanities Dept.
116.                      Nekaiya Herring, University of North Dakota, Dept. of Social Work
117.                      Karen Graves, Denison University, Department of Education
118.                      Lilia Monzo, Chapman University, College of Educational Studies
119.                      Karen Gourd, University of Washington, Bothell, Education Program
120.                      Jeff Bloom, Northern Arizona University, College of Education
121.                      Aisha El-Amin, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
122.                      Eric Toshalis, Lewis & Clark College, Graduate School of Education and Counseling
123.                      Diane Levin, Wheelock College, Early Childhood Education
124.                      Brian Horn, Illinois State University, College of Education
125.                      Scott Ritchie, Kennesaw State University, Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Education
126.                      Ann K. Schulte, California State University, Chico, School of Education
127.                      William T. Trent, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Educational Policy, Organization and Leadership
128.                      Morna McDermott, Towson University, College of Education
129.                      Susan Roberta Katz, University of San Francisco, School of Education
130.                      Susan Wray, Montclair State University, Dept. of Early Childhood, Elementary and Literacy Education
131.                      Sandra M. Gonzales, Wayne State University, College of Education
132.                      Cindy Lutenbacher, Morehouse College, Dept. of English
133.                      Mark Nagasawa, Erikson Institute
134.                      Wendy Luttrell, City University of New York, The Graduate Center
135.                      Mary Rapien, Bristol Community College, Division of Mathematics, Science and Engineering
136.                      Carolyne J. White, Rutgers University, Department of Urban Education
137.                      Isaura B. Pulido, Northeastern Illinois University, College of Education
138.                      Bill Watkins, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
139.                      Michelle Parker-Katz, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education
140.                      Barbara Morgan-Fleming, Texas Tech University, Curriculum & Instruction
141.                      Emma Haydée Fuentes, University of San Francisco, School of Education
142.                      Joel Westheimer, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Education
143.                      Brian D. Schultz, Northeastern Illinois University, College of Education 
144.                      Sumi Cho, DePaul University, College of Law
145.                      Therese Quinn, University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Art and Art History
146.                      John Rogers, UCLA, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies
147.                      Kathleen McInerney, Saint Xavier University, ESL/Bilingual Education Program
148.                      Linda Christensen, Lewis and Clark College, Oregon Writing Project
149.                      Elizabeth Skinner, Illinois State University, School of Teaching & Learning
150.                      G. Sue Kasun, Utah State University, Teacher Education and Leadership
151.                      Paul Gomberg, Chicago State University, Department of Criminal Justice, Philosophy, and Political Science
152.                      Andrea S. White,  Kenyon College, Psychology Department
153.                      Sandra Yarema, Wayne State University, College of Education
154.                      Michelle Maher, Oregon State University, Teacher and Counselor Education Dept.
155.                      Todd Alan Price, National Louis University, College of Education
156.                      Sarah Robbins,TCU, English Department
157.                      Eve Tuck, State University of New York at New Paltz, School of Education
158.                      John Duffy, National Louis University, Teacher Education (retired)
159.                      Suzanne Baker, Denison University, Department of Education
160.                      Anneli Frelin, University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies
161.                      Mara Sapon-Shevin, Syracuse University, School of Education
162.                      Ryan McCarthy, Wilbur Wright College, English Department
163.                      Randi Ploszaj,  Wilbur Wright College, English Department
164.                      Bill Marsh, Wilbur Wright College, English Department
165.                      Cydney Topping, Wilbur Wright College, English Department
166.                      Simeon Stumme, Concordia University, Center for Policy Studies and Social Justice
167.                      Daryl Dugas, Northern Illinois University, College of Education
168.                      Daniel McNamara, Wilbur Wright College, English Department
169.                      Judith Reed, Keene State College, Education Program
170.                      Marilyn Frankenstein, University of Massachusetts/Boston, College of Public and Community Service
171.                      Ellen Ellsberg Edge, Keene State College, Child Development Center
172.                      Tom Bassarear, Keene State College, Department of Education
173.                      Judy Lister, Keene State College, Education Department
174.                      Lee Shumow, Northern Illinois University, Leadership, Educational Psychology & Foundations Department
175.                      Carolyn Vander Schee, Northern Illinois University, Leadership, Educational Psychology & Foundations Department
176.                      Janet Lorch, National Louis University, Elementary and Middle Level Teacher Education
177.                      Angela Valenzuela, University of Texas-Austin, College of Education
178.                      Karyn Sandlos, School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Art Education Department
179.                      Joan Wynne, Florida International University, Leadership & Professional Studies
180.                      Omar Perez Riveros, University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology
181.                      Dana Fusco, York College, Department of Teacher Education
182.                      Leigh Patel, Boston College, Lynch School of Education
183.                      Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, University of Florida, School of Human Development and Organizational Studies in Education
184.                      Jermaine Soto, Syracuse University, Cultural Foundations of Education
185.                      Dorene Ross, University of Florida, College of Education
186.                      Molly A. Swick, Northern Illinois University, College of Education
187.                      Lori Chajet, City University of New York, The Graduate Center
188.                      Savannah Shange, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education & Africana Studies
189.                      Mary Ann Ryan, Chicago State University, English Department
190.                      Daniel McNamara, Wright College, English Department
191.                      Arthur B. Powell, Rutgers University—Newark, Department of Urban Education
192.                      Caitlin Cahill, Pratt Institute, Dept of Social Sciences & Cultural Studies
193.                      Sari Knopp Biklen, Syracuse University, Cultural Foundations of Education
194.                      Dayna Cunningham, MIT, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning
195.                      Jennifer Cannon, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies Dept.
196.                      Dani O’Brien, University of Massachusetts Amherst, College of Education
197.                      Amy Shuffelton, Concordia University, School of Education
198.                      Kate Sheesh, Hunter College (CUNY), Psychology Dept.
199.                      Sandra Schmidt, Columbia University, Teachers College
200.                      Noah Asher Golden, Chapman University, College of Educational Studies



Read the Full Story